WEDNESDAY.

With two yellow pamphlets, to his friend of many years, Varnhagen von

Ense, with old admiration and attachment. The author.

On the 29th January, 1852, Varnhagen’s journal reads as follows:

“Humboldt came at one o’clock, wonderfully robust for his time of life!

Speaks with indignant scorn of the _coup d’état_ in France, the

undisguised outrage, the arbitrary banishments, and particularly the

robbery of the estates of the Orleans family. The King was at first full

of rejoicing, he and the court saw nothing offensive in the crime

committed against the people, the legislature, the law, and the sanctity

of oaths, but that the adventurer preserves universal suffrage, rests

upon the people, practises socialism, and even wants to be emperor; this

is what makes him detested! Humboldt is of opinion that in the

revolution of February the establishment of the Provisional Government,

which was immediately obeyed throughout France, was a piece of even

greater audacity than the present usurpation of the one man who has

already been president, and worn the name of government for three years.

I reminded him of the parliament, and the committee of fifty at

Frankfort-on-the-Main. In the disposition to acquiesce, he sees that

national feeling of unity and cohesion which, among Frenchmen,

suppresses all party feeling. Humboldt says there is no doubt that Louis

Bonaparte is a son of Admiral Verhuel, and his brother, Morny, a son of

General Flahault, who, he says, lived with both the sisters, the Queen

of Holland and the Queen of Naples. Of Persigny—Fialin de Persigny—he

speaks with the utmost contempt, calling him a raw, unkempt

non-commissioned officer, who still arrogates to himself discoveries

about the pyramids. Passing on to our own affairs, he deplored the

narrowness, the pitiful character of our ministry; he considers Raumer

the most stupid of them all, stupid and unmannerly both; the King is

cross and peevish, capricious, and prone to excuse himself by saying

that he is powerless, and must be governed by his ministers.”

On the 30th of January, 1852, Varnhagen adds: “Humboldt takes a lively

interest in the widow of the philologist F.; her husband has done much

work for him. At Humboldt’s urgent advice, she has petitioned the King

for a pension, and Humboldt and Boekh were to support the petition by

their signatures. But F. was a democrat, not an active, but an avowed

one, and the King might have heard of it. To neutralize this, Humboldt

proposed to request Stahl to join in countersigning the petition. His

own name can now accomplish nothing with the King! On what days have we

fallen, when Humboldt asks Stahl to give him countenance!”

147.

HUMBOLDT TO VARNHAGEN.

BERLIN, _Feb. 5th, 1852_.

I believe, my dear friend, that the letter I have just received, will

greatly confirm your ideas about Paris. Galuski, the translator of the

second volume of Kosmos, is a man of noble instincts, great talents, and

much philological learning, but very moderate in his love of liberty.

What he says of his first impression, is a pretty impudent expression of

this moderation. He also was seized with a marvellous dread of coming

events. My opinion has always been that the wildest republic cannot do

so much and such enduring harm to the intellectual progress of mankind,

and to their consciousness of right and honor, as _le régime de mon

oncle, le despotisme éclairé, dogmatique, milieux_, which applies all

the arts of civilization to subject a people to the caprices of an

individual. Read, to increase your abhorrence of such degradation, which

threatens to spread like a pestilence, in the “Journal des Debats” of

this morning (February 3d), the reasons for drawing up a list of

recommendations of those who might be elected (according to the

“Constitutionnel).” The “Spenersche Zeitung” of yesterday did not fail

to follow suit with a communication in favor of a similar set of

proposals for our second chamber!

I hope soon to procure for you the Histoire de l’Académie (by

Bartholmess). I have made many vain efforts to advance the interests of

Professor F.’s widow.

Your most attached,

A. HUMBOLDT.

Letters of Alexander von Humboldt to Varnhagen von Ense. From 1827 to 1858. With extracts from Varnhagen's diaries, and letters of Varnhagen and others to Humboldt · 第 149 / 252 题