Chapter XIX. God’s Justice

1. The unshakable faith of the Jewish people was ever sustained by the

consciousness that its God is a God of justice. The conviction that He

will not suffer wrong to go unpunished was read into all the stories of

the hoary past. The Babylonian form of these legends in common with all

ancient folk-lore ascribes human calamity to blind fate or to the caprice

of the gods, but the Biblical narratives assume that evil does not befall

men undeserved, and therefore always ascribe ruin or death to human

transgression. So the Jewish genius beheld in the destruction of Sodom and

Gomorrah a divine judgment upon the depraved inhabitants, and derived from

it a lesson for the household of Abraham that they should “keep the way of

the Lord to do righteousness and justice.”(303) The fundamental principle

of Judaism throughout the ages has been the teaching of the patriarch that

“the Judge of all the earth cannot act unjustly,”(304) even though the

varying events of history force the problem of justice upon the attention

of Jeremiah,(305) the Psalmists,(306) the author of the book of Job,(307)

and the Talmudical sages.(308) “Righteousness and justice are the

foundations of Thy throne”(309)—this is the sum and substance of the

religious experience of Israel. At the same time man realizes how far from

his grasp is the divine justice: “Thy righteousness is like the mighty

mountains; Thy judgments are like the great deep.”(310)

2. The Master-builder of the moral world made justice the supporting

pillar of the entire creation. “He is The Rock, His work is perfect, for

all His ways are just; a God of faithfulness and without iniquity, just

and right is He.”(311) There can be no moral world order without a

retributive justice, which leaves no infringement of right unpunished,

just as no social order can exist without laws to protect the weak and to

enforce general respect. The God of Judaism rules over mankind as Guardian

and Vindicator of justice; no wrong escapes His scrutinizing gaze. This

fundamental doctrine invested history, of both the individual and the

nation, with a moral significance beyond that of any other religious or

ethical system.

Whatever practice or sense of justice may exist among the rest of mankind,

it is at best a glimpse of that divine righteousness which leads us on and

becomes a mighty force compelling us, not only to avoid wrongdoing, but to

combat it with all the passion of an indignant soul and eradicate it

wherever possible. Though in our daily experience justice may be sadly

lacking, we still cling to the moral axiom that God will lead the right to

victory and will hurl iniquity into the abyss. As the sages remark in the

Midrash: “How could short-sighted and short-lived man venture to assert,

‘All His ways are just,’ were it not for the divine revelation by which

the eyes of Moses were opened, so that he could gaze into the very depths

of life?”(312) That is, the idea of divine justice is revealed, not in the

world as it is, but in the world as it should be, the ideal cosmos which

lives in the spirit.

3. It cannot be denied that justice is recognized as a binding force even

by peoples on a low cultural plane, and the Deity is generally regarded as

the guardian of justice, exactly as in Judaism. This fact is shown by the

use of the oath in connection with judicial procedure among many nations.

Both Roman jurisprudence and Greek ethics declare justice to be the

foundation of the social life. Nevertheless the Jewish ideal of justice

cannot be identified with that of the law and the courts. The law is part

of the social system of the State, by which the relations of individuals

are determined and upheld. The maintenance of this social order, of the

_status quo_, is considered justice by the law, whatever injustice to

individuals may result. But the Jewish idea of justice is not reactionary;

it owes to the prophets its position as the dominating principle of the

world, the peculiar essence of God, and therefore the ultimate ideal of

human life. They fought for right with an insistence which vindicated its

moral significance forever, and in scathing words of indignation which

still burn in the soul they denounced oppression wherever it appeared. The

crimes of the mighty against the weak, they held, could not be atoned for

by the outward forms of piety. Right and justice are not simply matters

for the State and the social order, but belong to God, who defends the

cause of the helpless and the homeless, “who executes the judgment of the

fatherless and the widow,” “who regardeth not persons, nor taketh

bribes.”(313) Iniquity is hateful to Him; it cannot be covered up by pious

acts, nor be justified by good ends. “Justice is God’s.”(314) Thus every

violation of justice, whether from sordid self-seeking or from tender

compassion, is a violation of God’s cause; and every vindication of

justice, every strengthening of the power of right in society, is a

triumph of God.

4. Accordingly, the highest principle of ethics in Judaism, the cardinal

point in the government of the world, is not love, but _justice_. Love has

the tendency to undermine the right and to effeminize society. Justice, on

the other hand, develops the moral capacity of every man; it aims not

merely to avoid wrong, but to promote and develop the right for the sake

of the perfect state of morality. True justice cannot remain a passive

onlooker when the right or liberty of any human being is curtailed, but

strains every effort to prevent violence and oppression. It battles for

the right, until it has triumphed over every injustice. This practical

conception of right can be traced through all Jewish literature and

doctrine; through the laws of Moses, to whom is ascribed the maxim: “Let

the right have its way, though it bore holes through the rock”,(315)

through the flaming words of the prophets;(316) through the Psalmists, who

spoke such words as these: “Thou art not a God who hath pleasure in

wickedness; evil shall not sojourn with Thee. The arrogant shall not stand

in Thy sight; Thou hatest all workers of iniquity.”(317)

Nor does justice stop with the prohibition of evil. The very arm that

strikes down the presumptuous transgressor turns to lift up the meek and

endow him with strength. Justice becomes a positive power for the right;

it becomes _Zedakah_, righteousness or true benevolence, and aims to

readjust the inequalities of life by kindness and love. It engenders that

deeper sense of justice which claims the right of the weak to protection

by the arm of the strong.

5. Hence comes the truth of Matthew Arnold’s striking summary of Israel’s

Law and Prophets in his “Literature and Dogma,” as “The Power, not

ourselves, that maketh for righteousness.” Still, when we trace the

development of this central thought in the soul of the Jewish people, we

find that it arose from a peculiar mythological conception. The God of

Sinai had manifested Himself in the devastating elements of nature—fire,

storm, and hail; later, the prophetic genius of Israel saw Him as a moral

power who destroyed wickedness by these very phenomena in order that right

should prevail. At first the covenant-God of Israel hurls the plagues of

heaven upon the hostile Egyptians and Canaanites, the oppressors of His

people. Afterward the great prophets speak of the Day of JHVH which would

come at the end of days, when God will execute His judgment upon the

heathen nations by pouring forth all the terrors of nature upon them. The

natural forces of destruction are utilized by the Ruler of heaven as means

of moral purification. “For by fire will the Lord contend.”(318)

In this process the sense of right became progressively refined, so that

God was made the Defender of the cause of the oppressed, and the holiest

of duties became the protection of the forsaken and unfortunate. Justice

and right were thus lifted out of the civil or forensic sphere into that

of divine holiness, and the struggle for the down-trodden became an

imperative duty. Judaism finds its strength in the oft-repeated doctrine

that the moral welfare of the world rests upon justice. “The King’s

strength is that he loveth justice,” says the Psalmist, and commenting

upon this the Midrash says, “Not might, but right forms the foundation of

the world’s peace.”(319)

6. Social life, therefore, must be built upon the firm foundation of

justice, the full recognition of the rights of all individuals and all

classes. It can be based neither upon the formal administration of law nor

upon the elastic principle of love, which too often tolerates, or even

approves certain types of injustice. Judaism has been working through the

centuries to realize the ideal of justice to all mankind; therefore the

Jew has suffered and waited for the ultimate triumph of the God of

justice. God’s kingdom of justice is to be established, not in a world to

come, but in the world that now is, in the life of men and nations. As the

German poet has it, “Die Weltgeschichte ist das Weltgericht” (the history

of the world is the world’s tribunal of justice).

7. The recognition of God as the righteous Ruler implies a dominion of

absolute justice which allows no wrongdoing to remain unpunished and no

meritorious act to remain unrewarded. The moral and intellectual maturity

of the people, however, must determine how they conceive retribution in

the divine judgment. Under the simple conditions of patriarchal life, when

common experience seemed to be in harmony with the demands of divine

justice, when the evil-doer seemed to meet his fate and the worthy man to

enjoy his merited prosperity, reward and punishment could well be

expressed by the Bible in terms of national prosperity and calamity. The

prophets, impressed by the political and moral decline of their era,

announced for both Israel and the other nations a day of judgment to come,

when God will manifest Himself as the righteous Ruler of the world. In

fact, those great preachers of righteousness announced for all time the

truth of a _moral government of the world_, with terror for the

malefactors and the assurance of peace and salvation for the righteous.

“He will judge the world with righteousness, and the peoples with equity”

becomes a song of joyous confidence and hope on the lips of the

Psalmist.(320) This final triumph of justice does not depend, as Christian

theologians assert, on the mere outward conformity of Israel to the

law.(321) On the contrary, it offers to the innocent sufferer the hope

that “his right shall break forth as light,” while “the wicked shall be

put to silence in darkness.”(322) We must admit, indeed, that the Biblical

idea of retribution still has too much of the earthly flavor, and often

lacks true spirituality. The explanation of this lies in the desire of the

expounders of Judaism that _this_ world should be regarded as the

battle-ground between the good and the bad, that the victory of the good

is to be decided _here_, and that the idea of justice should not assume

the character of other-worldliness.

8. It is true that neither the prophets, such as Jeremiah, nor the sages,

such as the authors of Job and Koheleth, actually solved the great enigma

which has baffled all nations and ages, the adjustment of merit and

destiny by divine righteousness. Yet even a doubter like Job does not

despair of his own sense of justice, and wrestles with his God in the

effort to obtain a deeper insight. Still the great mass of people are not

satisfied with an unfulfilled yearning and seeking. The various religions

have gradually transferred the final adjustment of merit and destiny to

the hereafter; the rewards and punishments awaiting man after death have

been depicted glaringly in colors taken from this earthly life. It is not

surprising that Judaism was influenced by this almost universal view. The

mechanical form of the principle of justice demands that “with the same

measure one metes out, it shall be meted out to him,”(323) and this could

not be found either in human justice or in human destiny. Therefore the

popular mind naturally turned to the world to come, expecting there that

just retribution which is lacking on earth.

Only superior minds could ascend to that higher ethical conception where

compensation is no longer expected, but man seeks the good and happiness

of others and finds therein his highest satisfaction. As Ben Azzai

expresses it, “The reward of virtue is virtue, and the punishment of sin

is sin.”(324) At this point justice merges into divine holiness.

9. The idea of divine justice exerted its uplifting force in one more way

in Judaism. The recognition of God as the righteous Judge of the

world—_Zidduk ha Din_(325)—is to bring consolation and endurance to the

afflicted, and to remove from their hearts the bitter sting of despair and

doubt. The rabbis called God “the Righteous One of the universe,”(326) as

if to indicate that God himself is meant by the Scriptural verse, “The

righteous is an everlasting foundation of the world.”(327)

Far remote from Judaism, however, is the doctrine that God would consign

an otherwise righteous man to eternal doom, because he belongs to another

creed or another race than that of the Jew. Wherever the heathens are

spoken of as condemned at the last judgment, the presumption based upon

centuries of sad experience was that their lives were full of injustice

and wickedness. Indeed, milder teachers, whose view became the accepted

one, maintained that truly righteous men are found among the heathen, who

have therefore as much claim upon eternal salvation as the pious ones of

Israel.(328)

Jewish Theology, Systematically and Historically Considered · 第 16 / 34 章