THOMAS W. SALMON, M. D.

Attention has again been directed to the unsatisfactory conditions which

prevail in the administration of quarantine inspection at the port of

New York by the report of a special committee of the New York Academy of

Medicine.

This report, which was recently made public, strongly advocated the

national control of quarantine from “the point of view of convenience,

efficiency and uniformity of administration, economy and law.” The

subject aroused discussion in the newspapers a few weeks ago because the

chairman of Governor Sulzer’s commission for the investigation of state

departments urged the transfer of this function to the federal

government.

In the discussion of this recommendation, several important points have

been overlooked. For example, there is some significance in the

discrepancy between the large sums spent by New York on the quarantine

station, which protects the country at large, and the small amount

expended for the State Health Department, upon which rests the

protection of the citizens of the state. Doubtless, as has been pointed

out, the fees charged steamship companies can be increased so that the

state will not be required to make any annual appropriations for the

maintenance of the quarantine station but the health officer of the port

has asked for an appropriation of about $1,800,000 for needed repairs

and improvements. About $180,000 is appropriated for the State

Department of Health each year. This constitutes practically all the

money spent by the state for the protection of the health of its

9,000,000 citizens. Out of it must be paid all salaries and expenses of

administration, the cost of collecting vital statistics, maintaining

laboratories for research and for the production of diphtheria

antitoxin, the control of epidemics, the inspection of water supplies

and, in short, all the work in the prevention of disease in which the

state is engaged. If the Legislature grants the $1,800,000 which the

health officer of the port requests, it will give him an amount equal to

that expended during ten years for safeguarding the health of those

residing in the state.

Closely related to this aspect of the question is the fact, which has

received little attention, that some of the largest immigrant-carrying

lines do not enter New York at all but dock at Hoboken and Jersey City.

Last year more than 36 per cent. of all the passengers who arrived at

this port from Europe landed in New Jersey. The following table shows

the passengers brought during 1912 by steamship lines having docks at

Hoboken and Jersey City:

STEAMSHIP LINES CABIN STEERAGE TOTAL

North German Lloyd 51,920 118,803 170,723

Hamburg American 38,033 98,043 136,076

Holland American 18,611 33,877 52,488

Scandinavian American 5,265 13,064 18,329

Lloyd Sabaudo 652 7,119 7,771

──────────────────────────────────────────────

114,481 270,906 385,387

Less than 30 per cent. of the immigrants who arrived at this port during

the year remained in this state, a large proportion landing in New

Jersey, being examined at Ellis Island and going west by one of the

railroad lines terminating at Jersey City. They were distributed over a

wide area and it cannot be denied that it is chiefly for the protection

of distant states that New York’s expensive quarantine is maintained.

Much has been said about the advantages to commerce of the state control

of quarantine at the port of New York. If $300,000 are collected during

1913 in fees from steamship companies, the amount will equal the

earnings on $7,500,000 of invested capital. In other words, an amount of

capital which would purchase ten large freighters must be set aside to

meet the quarantine dues at this port for one year. If ten such vessels

were tied up at one of the piers in this city for a year, as an object

lesson, we would not hear very much about the advantages to commerce

which local control of quarantine insures.

The tax rate in the Borough of Manhattan for 1911 was 1.72248. At such a

rate it would be necessary to tax $17,000,000 of capital to raise

$300,000 a year. This means that a tax equal to that rate on real estate

in the Borough of Manhattan has to be levied on $17,000,000 of the

capital of steamship companies to pay for a quarantine station, the cost

of which should be borne by the country which it protects.

Another phase of the question which has not been touched upon is the

relation between quarantine and the medical control of immigration. At

ports where the United States Public Health Service administers the

quarantine law and conducts the medical inspection of immigrants, the

two functions are performed under conditions making each more efficient

and also reducing interference with commerce to a minimum. The medical

inspection of immigrants at Ellis Island, which is performed by medical

officers of the United States Public Health Service, constitutes the

second line of quarantine defense and not a few cases of small-pox and

typhus fever which have escaped observation at the state quarantine

station have been detected in the medical examination at Ellis Island.

If both functions were performed by the Public Health Service at this

port the work could be carried on much more effectively and with benefit

to the immigrant—a factor which no one seems to have considered. When

cases of scarlet fever, measles, diphtheria and the other contagious

diseases of childhood were taken off vessels at the state quarantine

station, children died without their mothers, who were detained at Ellis

Island, even being able to visit them once during their illness. At the

same time a magnificent new group of hospitals for contagious diseases

remained idle at Ellis Island. No better example of the danger and

inutility of divided control could be found than this.

The Survey, Volume 30, Number 4, Apr 26, 1913 · 第 17 / 86 题