CHAPTER XI

THE FRIENDLY VISITOR

I have tried to make a number of specific suggestions in the foregoing

pages, but it is needless to say that only a few of these are likely to

be useful to any one visitor, and it would be fatal to apply them all

to one family. In the effort to be specific, I fear that I may have

been as exasperating as the cook-books, which, in a similar effort,

will suggest, "take a salamander," or "take a slip of endive," when

neither is obtainable. Cook-books have their modest uses, however, and

the cooks who are most skilful in skipping recipes not intended for

them will turn the others to the best account.

In avoiding the danger of representing friendly visiting as a pleasant

diversion, I may have gone to the other extreme, and represented it

rather as an arduous and {180} exacting profession. It is so far from

being this, that professional visiting can never be friendly. In fact,

friendly visiting is not any of the things already described in this

book. It is not wise measures of relief; it is not finding employment;

it is not getting the children in school or training them for work; it

is not improving sanitary arrangements and caring for the sick; it is

not teaching cleanliness or economical cooking or buying; it is not

enforcing habits of thrift or encouraging healthful recreations. It

may be a few of these things, or all of them, but it is always

something more. Friendly visiting means intimate and continuous

knowledge of and sympathy with a poor family's joys, sorrows, opinions,

feelings, and entire outlook upon life. The visitor that has this is

unlikely to blunder either about relief or any detail; without it, he

is almost certain, in any charitable relations with members of the

family, to blunder seriously. Visitors have said to me that they could

not see that they had been of any special service, though their

friendly feeling for certain families made it impossible to stop

visiting. These visitors {181} who have no story to tell have often

done the greatest good. "One of the women we had not seen since she

first came to us some four years before," writes Miss Frances Smith,

"and we remembered her distinctly as quite ordinary then. Imagine our

surprise in finding that a certain dignity and earnestness, akin to

that of the visitor, had crept into this woman's life, and found

expression in her face and bearing. Such transfigurations cannot take

place in a few weeks or months; they are of slow growth, but they are

the best rewards of friendship." [1]

The rewards of friendly visiting and the best results of such work are

obviously not dependent upon the suggestions of a handbook. As Miss

Octavia Hill has said, success in this depends no more on rules than

does that of a young lady who begins housekeeping. "Certain things she

should indeed know; but whether she manages well or ill depends mainly

upon what she is." Life, therefore, is the best school.

Meddlesomeness, {182} lack of tact, impatience for results,

carelessness in keeping engagements and promises, will be as fatal here

as anywhere.

When we are depressed by a family's troubles and are striving earnestly

to find a way out, theirs seem quite unlike any other troubles. In a

sense, it is true that they are unlike; but there are certain

resemblances between human beings, even when a continent divides them;

and, unsafe though it may be to administer charity by rule, it is more

unsafe to administer it without reference to certain general

principles. Many of the suggestions of this book are not of universal

application, but, in bringing it to a close, I shall endeavor to state

a few principles that apply quite universally to friendly visiting.

1. The friendly visitor should get well acquainted with all the

members of the family without trying to force their confidence. A

fault of beginners is that they are unwilling to wait for the natural

development of trust and friendliness. "They expect to make a half

dozen visits on a poor family inside of a month," says Miss Birtwell,

"and see them {183} helped. Now, which one of us ever had our lives

strongly influenced by a friendship of a month's standing? . . . I

once heard a sermon which made an impression on my mind that has

remained with me for years. One of its main ideas was to get your

influence before you used it. Many people seem to think that if they

can visit a poor family, by virtue of their superior education and

culture, they must immediately have a very strong influence. They do

not get it that way. They must get it just as our friends get an

influence over us, by long, patient contact, and by the slow, natural

growth of friendship." [2]

Patience is difficult where we see so many things to be done, and it is

particularly difficult where there is actual need; but the visitor does

not go to act as a substitute for the forces, charitable or other, that

have kept the family alive so far. He must confer with sources of

relief that are or can be interested, but beyond this he must have the

courage to {184} do nothing until he knows what is the right thing to

do.

It is not possible to visit many families, but there are definite

advantages in visiting more than one--the usual limit should be not

less than two nor more than four. An advantage in visiting two

families is that the visitor is less likely to be feverishly active

during the earlier stages of acquaintance, and the contrasts and

resemblances between the two give the visitor a better grasp of

principles. Not only is a new visitor liable to err in overvisiting a

family, but some families have too many charitable visitors. The New

York visitor, who refused to go to a family on whom three charity

workers had lately called, was wise. There are families so clearly

overvisited that all who are charitably interested in them should be

persuaded to let them alone for a while.

It ought to be unnecessary to add that the winter is not the only time

for charitable work. Our poor friends need us quite as much in summer,

though many charities are less active then. When we are away in summer

we can {185} write, and when we are in town for a short while we can

often find time for a visit. Charitable work suffers from the

tradition that the only time to be charitable is when it is cold.

Next to uninterrupted visiting as a means of getting acquainted, comes

the power of taking our own interests with us when we visit. "In our

contact with poor people we do not always give ourselves as generously

as we might. Intent upon finding out about them, we forget that they

might be interested to hear about us. Would it not be well if, instead

of always giving sympathy, we sometimes asked it? It is often

striking, if we tell them about the joys and sorrows of our friends, to

note how they respond, often inquiring about them afterward. Such

mutual relationship broadens their meagre lives, and makes our contact

with them more human. A visitor, who has undertaken during the summer

the families of another too far away to visit, wrote: 'I want to tell

you what a matter of interest and pleasure it has been to me, in

visiting your families, to find that what they {186} really seemed to

value was your personal friendship for them, and how they treasured any

little incident you had told them of yourself and your travels.'" [3]

One who visits in this spirit always wins more of pleasure and of

profit from the work. In fact, it is never the visited only that are

benefited.

2. In getting acquainted, the visitor has the definite object of

trying to improve the condition of the family. This is impossible

unless he has a fairly accurate knowledge of the main facts of the

family history. Charity workers often come to me for advice about

individual families, and reveal in a few minutes' conversation that

they have no knowledge of the condition of those they would help. The

head of the family is sick, it may be, and they expect prompt advice as

to the best way to help him; but they have not taken the trouble to see

the dispensary doctor who attends him, or to find out in some other way

the nature of his disease; or perhaps the boy is out of work, but they

have not seen his {187} former employer and know nothing of his earning

capacity or references. Charitable skill is not a sort of benevolent

magic; it is based on common sense, and must work in close contact with

the facts of life. In other friendly relations we recognize this, and

in our charity work too, whether by investigation of a trained agent or

by our own inquiries, we must have the facts before we can find out the

best way to help. One advantage of visiting under the guidance of a

charity organization society is that a thorough investigation has been

made of the family circumstances before the visitor is sent.

The following is a brief outline of the facts that should be known, if

a plan is to be made for the family's benefit:

(a) _Social History._--Names; ages; birthplaces; marriage; number of

rooms occupied; education; children's school; names, addresses, and

condition of relatives and friends; church; previous residences.

(b) _Physical History._--Health of each member of the family; name of

doctor; habits.

(c) _Work History._--Occupations; names {188} and addresses of present

and former employers; how long and at what seasons usually in work; how

long out of work now; earning capacity of each worker.

(d) _Financial History._--Rent; landlord; debts, including instalment

purchases; beneficial societies; trade-union; life insurance; pawn

tickets; has family ever saved and how much?; present savings; income;

present means of subsistence other than wages; pensions; relief,

sources, and amount; charities interested.

In addition to these detached facts, there is also needed whatever

other facts will make a fairly complete brief biography of the heads of

the family, including a knowledge of their hopes and plans. The

statements of relatives and friends, their theory as to the best method

of aiding, together with some definite promise as to what they

themselves will do; the statements of pastor or Sunday-school teacher,

of doctor, former employers, and former landlords; and the statements

and experiences also of others charitably interested may be needed

before an effective plan can be made.

{189}

Inquiries of present employers and landlords should be made with

extreme care, if at all, as they might create prejudice against those

we would help.

The outline here given of the facts needed is best filled in by a

competent trained agent, rather than by the friendly visitor, whose

relations with the family render searching inquiry difficult and often

undesirable. But the mercifulness of a thorough investigation is that,

once well done, it need not be repeated, and by saving endless

blundering it also saves a family from much charitable meddling. Its

seemingly inquisitorial features are justified by the fact that it is

not made with any purpose of finding people out, but with the sole

purpose of finding out how to help them.

3. Gathering facts about the poor without making any effort to use

these facts for their good has been compared to harrowing the ground

without sowing the seed. The facts should be made the basis of a

well-considered plan. It may be necessary to modify our plans often,

as circumstances change or new facts are discovered; but a plan of

treatment {190} is as indispensable to the charity worker as to the

physician. Our plans must not ignore the family resources for

self-help. The best charity work develops these resources. If outside

help is needed, it should be made conditional upon renewed efforts at

work or in school, upon willingness to receive training, upon

cleanliness, or upon some other development within the family that will

aid in their uplifting. All this is suggested, not with a view to

making the conditions of relief difficult, but with a view to using

relief as a lever; or, as some one has put it, we should make our help

a ladder rather than a crutch, and every sensible, reasonable condition

is a round in the ladder.

Our plans for the benefit of one family must not ignore the possible

effects of our action upon other families. This is a hard lesson to

learn, but a plan that might be kind and effective, if there were only

one poor family in the city, is often unfair and even cruel, because it

rouses hopes in others which can never be fulfilled. In other words,

we must be just as well as merciful. A {191} knowledge of the

neighborhood and of the circumstances of other poor families is

necessary in judging of the justice of a plan, and here the criticism

and advice of an experienced charity worker will be very helpful.

It is necessary also to guard against making our plans with reference

to nothing but the present emergency. We must have a view to the

future of the family, and must think not only of what will put them out

of immediate need, but of what is most likely to make them permanently

self-supporting, if this be possible. There are, of course, families

that can never be made entirely self-supporting. These, if we consider

only the cases for which it is thought best to provide outside of

institutions, will be the exceptions; but in making plans for the

welfare of such families we must try to organize help that shall be as

regular and systematic as possible. Next to having to depend upon

charitable resources at all, the most demoralizing thing is to be

dependent upon uncertain and spasmodic charity.

4. In plans looking to the removal of the causes of distress, the

greatest patience is {192} needed, and we must learn also, if we would

succeed, to win the coöperation of others charitably interested. If

our plan with regard to a family is likely to prove permanently

helpful, and we are able to persuade others to work with us in carrying

it out, we are not only helping the family, but we are educating others

in common-sense methods. In persuading to an important step, the value

of coöperation is illustrated by an instance taken from the Fourteenth

Report of the Boston Associated Charities:[4] "A respectable woman, who

had struggled for a year to keep her insane husband with her and the

little girls, at great risk to them and the neighborhood, was persuaded

in but a few days to let him go to the lunatic hospital. Of course, as

strangers, our opinions were entitled to little weight; but by

collecting the doctor's opinions and those of her own friends, all of

which she had heard singly, she was sufficiently impressed to take the

long necessary step."

5. Though we must make plans looking toward self-support, these are

not the only plans {193} within the scope of friendly visiting. Some

of the best visiting can be done after families are no longer in need.

The entry "dismissed--self-sustaining" on charitable records has a very

unsatisfactory sound to those who realize the further possibilities of

friendly help. After a family has learned to live without charitable

aid, there is a better chance of introducing its members to thrifty

ways of spending and saving, to better recreations, and to healthier

and more cleanly surroundings.

6. Our work as friendly visitors is an intensely personal work, and,

unlike other charity, it is best done alone. We cannot visit in

companies of two or three, nor can we talk very much about our poor

friends, except to those charitably interested, without spoiling our

relations with them. The district system of visiting among the poor,

which is still the system of German towns and of English parishes,

assigns a certain geographical boundary to each visitor. It has been

called the "space system" in contrast to the "case system" of friendly

visiting. The main objection to it is that it is not personal enough.

{194} One who is a friend to a whole street is not felt by the members

of any particular family to belong peculiarly to them, and there is

danger, moreover, of more official relations and of small jealousies

and neighborhood entanglements that are avoided by the friendly

visiting plan.

The district visitor is the ancestor of the friendly visitor. Brewing

a bit of broth for an aged cottager, reading beside some sick-bed,

sewing a warm garment for Peggy or Nancy--it is thus that our ancestors

lightly skimmed the surface of social conditions. It would ill become

us to speak slightingly of the work of those who have handed down to us

a precious freight of human sympathy and tenderness. If heavier

burdens of responsibility, more serious problems and more strenuous

ideals are now imposed upon us, we have also many advantages that were

undreamed of a hundred years ago. Now, if we would be charitable, and

possess any power of using the forces at our command, there are

hundreds of avenues of usefulness open to us where formerly there was

only one, and there are hundreds of {195} agencies ready to help. We

must know how to work with others, and we must know how to work with

the forces that make for progress; friendly visiting, rightly

understood, turns all these forces to account, working with the

democratic spirit of the age to forward the advance of the plain and

common people into a better and larger life.

Collateral Readings: "Friendly or Volunteer Visiting," Miss Zilpha D.

Smith in Proceedings of Eleventh National Conference of Charities, pp.

69 _sq_. "Friendly Visiting," Mrs. Marian C. Putnam in Proceedings of

Fourteenth National Conference of Charities, pp. 149 _sq_. "Class for

the Study of Friendly Visiting," Mrs. S. E. Tenney in Proceedings of

Nineteenth National Conference of Charities, pp. 455 _sq_. "The

Education of the Friendly Visitor," Miss Z. D. Smith in Proceedings of

Nineteenth National Conference of Charities, pp. 445 _sq_. "Friendly

Visiting," Mrs. Roger Wolcott in Proceedings of International Congress

of Charities, 1893, volume on "Organization of Charities," pp. 108

_sq_. Also Miss F. C. Prideaux in same volume, pp. 369 _sq_. and

discussion, pp. 15 _sq_. "Continued Care of Families," Frances A.

Smith in Proceedings of Twenty-second National Conference of Charities,

pp. 87 _sq_. "Friendly Visiting as a Social Force," Charles F. Weller

in Proceedings of Twenty-fourth National Conference of Charities, pp.

199 _sq_. "Company Manners," Florence Converse in "Atlantic," January,

1898. (This story is not a fair picture of associated charity methods,

but points out one of the dangers of spasmodic visiting.)

[1] Proceedings of Twenty-second Conference of Charities, 1895, p. 88.

[2] Proceedings of International Congress of Charities, volume on

"Organization of Charities," p. 21.

[3] Eleventh Report of Boston Associated Charities, p. 31.

[4] p. 27.

{197}

APPENDIX

The illustrations of friendly visiting in the preceding pages have been

given with a view to elucidating some particular part of visiting work.

Some of the following instances show the possibilities and

discouragements of continuous visiting, and the last illustration

emphasizes an important fact in the life of poor neighborhoods; namely,

the unconscious but restraining and uplifting influence of good

neighbors. On this same phase of the subject, see Charles Booth's "Life

and Labor of the People," Vol. I, p. 159.

_Home Libraries and the Visitor._--A visitor reports that "a library has

been established in the room of Mrs. ----, where the boys of the tenement

house meet every Saturday afternoon to receive or exchange their books,

discuss with the visitor the books they have read, listen to stories as

they are read or narrated, and to play games. This little gathering

seems to have improved the moral and social atmosphere of the entire

tenement house."

The woman who has charge of the library first became known to this same

visitor over four years ago, {198} when she was struggling upon the verge

of starvation, and almost giving up in despair from the effort to support

herself and her two children. Through the efforts of the visitor she is

now comfortable and practically self-supporting. She has been made

librarian for the tenement house by the visitor, and is proud of the

distinction. The following are the exact words of the visitor: "She

welcomes the children into her room, made scrupulously clean and

attractive; and as she sits at her work and listens to their games and

readings, in which she frequently participates, her depressed spirits

rise, and she seems to gain courage, and to feel that there is after all

something bright in her life."--Sixteenth Report of Cincinnati Associated

Charities, p. 13.

_After Five Years._--The C. family--father, mother, and eight

children--were in a very depressed condition when I first made their

acquaintance, five years ago. The father, who was a consumptive, had

lost his position of travelling postman; the mother was ill; and the only

source of income was a monthly pension of $8.00 and about $8.00 a week

earned by the three eldest girls, who were saleswomen. The rent was

$15.00 a month, and the family heavily in debt. I succeeded in finding

them a house for $9.00 a month, and found assistance in flour, coal, and

clothing. An unknown friend undertook to add $1.00 a month to {199} Mr.

C.'s pension, and this paid the rent. Twice, when the girls were ill,

the Golden Book Fund came to the rescue and made up the temporary

deficiency. I tried to represent to them the dignity of keeping a roof

over their heads by their own efforts. First, it became possible to

dispense with the monthly gift of $1.00. Later, when the girls' wages

were raised, Mrs. C. told me I need not provide fuel,--they would now try

to do that themselves. One summer, whilst I was away, the youngest child

died, and the funeral expenses were paid by the family, through much

self-denial. Every year the girls have been sent to their friends in the

country by the Fresh Air Fund of the Y.W.C.A., and once the younger

children were sent to the Children's Country Home. The parents continued

in wretched health; but as the girls' wages gradually increased, I was

asked by Mrs. C. not to provide further aid, except in case of sickness.

In 1891, Mr. C.'s pension was more than doubled, but they continued in

their poor and unattractive neighborhood until every debt was paid, not

forgetting the doctor. Last summer they moved into a larger house on a

pleasant street, and have enough lodgers to pay more than half the rent.

Mr. C.'s health has improved, and he has a light position at $25.00 a

month and his meals. The oldest girl has married well, the two other

girls are good workers, and my old friends sure now well on their feet.

During absence we have {200} corresponded regularly. Mrs. C. has learned

to come to me in every difficulty, and knows how gladly I share her

encouragements.--"Charities Record," Baltimore, Vol. I, No. 1.

_Persevering under Difficulties._--We are each year more strongly

impressed with the importance and value of patient and careful visiting,

even in the face of great discouragement, believing that sincere and

judicious friendliness is invariably helpful, although it may be long

before any apparent result is produced. Proofs of this are constantly

coming to us, as in a German family which has been for the last six years

under the care of one of our visitors. The family consists of father,

mother, and five children, and, when first visited, they were found

almost destitute,--the woman earning a little by picking berries in the

summer and selling them, and the man by picking coal,--though they were

well able to work. The visitor was received very ungraciously at first,

and it was only after finding some work for the man, and showing a real

interest in the children, that she gained any hold upon them. No really

marked improvement took place until the children went to the Industrial

School. Then the girls taught their mother how her work should be done,

and it was with great pride that they showed the visitor how neat they

had made their rooms. Work was obtained for the man as {201}

night-watchman at $12.00 a week, and, after a while, he was able to pay

off all his back debts. He is now always glad to see the visitor. Three

of the girls are at work, and they seem a happy and prosperous

family.--Tenth Report of Boston Associated Charities, p. 55.

_Widow with Children._--A typical case of chronic dependence is that of a

widow with six children. When she was referred to us, nearly four years

ago, her children were very young, and she, though well-meaning, was

stupid and inefficient. The problem was not whether aid should be

given,--that was clearly necessary, for the woman could not earn anything

with her little children to care for,--but if the aid could be given in

such a way as to really benefit them. Relief was procured from the

proper sources,--$20.00 a quarter from the "Shaw Fund for Mariners'

Children," $2.00 a month in groceries from the city, and at times $1.00 a

week from the St. Vincent de Paul Society. The visitor who first

interested himself in the family, and who has been their friend and

counsellor ever since, received the quarterly $20.00 for them, paid the

rent with $13.00 of it, and gave the rest to the woman, who knew just

what she had to depend upon, and learned to use it properly. As the

children grew older, the boy went into a district telegraph office; and

the girl, wishing to go into a store, asked the visitor to find her a

place. He thought, however, {202} that it was wiser to teach her how to

find one, and, after suggesting some good establishments to which to

apply, told her to get references from her schoolteacher and others, and

go herself to ask for work. This she did with some difficulty, and got a

place; and when, after a time, she gave it up, she knew what to do, and

had no difficulty in finding another. The boy refused to be apprenticed

to a joiner, as the visitor wished, but is working hard in a place he

found himself. The second boy goes to school, and sells papers. In

summer, the visitor, with the consent of the Conference, has sent the

younger children into the country to board for a month. He has taken

pains to have the family live in a healthy tenement, and in many ways has

insured their well-being. They are now partially self-supporting; and

the older children are respectable and industrious, which we feel is

greatly due to the influence that the visitor has exerted over them and

their mother for four years.--Fourth Report of Boston Associated

Charities, p. 40.

_A Failure._--Gamma made his first application to the Charity

Organization Society seven years ago, at a time when it was even more

difficult than now to find volunteer visitors who were intelligent and

faithful enough to make a careful study of the needs of families placed

under their charge, or courageous enough to carry out any thorough plan

of treatment in these {203} families. The man was a German cobbler who

had married an American domestic, and at that time there were three

children, one of them an imbecile with destructive tendencies. The man

said he was discouraged, that he got work with difficulty and had no

tools with which to do it. Materials were furnished and members of the

Society found work for him, but, this form of assistance not being very

much to his mind, they soon lost sight of him, and it was not till

several years later that the Society again encountered the family in a

different part of the city, and a friendly visitor was secured to study

their condition and try and improve it.

The visitor reported that the man was "discouraged," the house filthy

beyond description, and that the life of the fourth child, then nine

months old, was endangered by the imbecile boy, who was violent at times.

Aid was given, and, the man's own theory being that he could do better in

another neighborhood, the family was moved and otherwise aided by money

secured from benevolent individuals. It soon became apparent that the

man lacked energy. He was given to pious phrases, and was a good talker,

but all efforts to inculcate industry or cleanliness were met both by man

and wife with the excuse that the imbecile boy interfered with all their

efforts.

At the family's own solicitation, the Society tried to find a home for

the boy; after months of negotiations {204} he was placed in the School

for Feeble-minded at Owing's Mills. This burden removed, the visitor

redoubled her efforts to make the home a decent one for the remaining

children, but without success. The beds were not made until they were to

be slept in, the dishes not washed until they must be used again, and

soiled clothing was allowed to stand in soak a week at a time in hot

weather, until a heavy scum gathered on the top and the air was poisoned

by the stench. The remaining children were unkempt and untrained, and

the woman quite indifferent about their condition. The imbecile had

improved at Owing's Mills, but, owing to a half-expressed wish of the

mother's to see the boy, Gamma brought him home and refused to take him

back again. The man's good intentions always seemed to evaporate in fine

phrases. He was reported by the neighbors to be drinking, though not

heavily, and one morning the visitor received a letter from him saying

that she must take care of his family--he could stand it no longer and

had left them.

One thing greatly handicapped the visitor at this time and later: the

squalor of this family strongly appealed to chance charitable visitors,

who helped them liberally because they looked miserable--helped them

without knowledge and without plan. It used to be said that every

American thinks he can make an after-dinner speech, and it might have

been added that every American, or nearly every American, thinks {205} he

can administer his own charities judiciously. When we are mistaken in

our speech-making ability, we ourselves are the sufferers, but the

saddest thing about our charitable blunders is that not we but the poor

people are the sufferers. The friendly visitor to the Gammas was a woman

of unusual intelligence and devotion. Her failure may be traced to two

causes: to the fact that she was not called in earlier, and to the

willingness of many good church people to help quite indiscriminately for

the asking. They went and looked at the home, saw that it was wretched

indeed, and called this "an investigation." "Yes, I've helped the

Gammas," they used to say. "I've investigated their condition myself."

The way in which Gamma was in the habit of talking about the Bible as his

best friend made a great impression on them.

The man's desertion of his family was a mere ruse. He was soon back

again, and ready to profit by the help they had obtained. Moving from

place to place to avoid rent, they were at last ejected, and the man,

wife, and children, including the imbecile, found refuge in the stable of

a kind-hearted man who took pity on them. The owner was alarmed,

however, when he found the family making no effort to find other

quarters, and fearing the imbecile might set fire to the place at any

time, he applied to the Charity Organization Society to know what could

be done. We offered the woman and children shelter at the Electric

Sewing {206} Machine Rooms, until the boy could be sent back to Owing's

Mills and the other children committed to the Henry Watson Children's Aid

Society, and advised that the man saw wood at the Friendly Inn until he

could get work. The man refused to go, but the woman and children came

to the Electric Rooms, and with the coöperation of the Society for the

Protection of Children, the imbecile was returned to Owing's Mills.

At this juncture the daily papers interfered with our plans for the

children by publishing a sensational account of Gamma as a most

industrious shoemaker, who had always supported his family until the hard

times of the last year had thrown him out of work. Money was sent to the

papers for the family. Gamma, who had consented to have two of the

children placed in good country homes by the Henry Watson Aid Society,

changed his mind, and the old story of indiscriminate charity and

indiscriminate filth and neglect began all over again. The gentleman who

had given them shelter thought they ought to have another trial. They

had had six years' trial already, but this last one was of short

duration. In four months their champion returned to say that the Charity

Organization Society was right and he was wrong; that he had found Gamma

drunken, lazy, and insolent; and that the children raised under his

influence must become paupers and criminals. Again the family were

ejected, and this {207} time, before public sympathy could interfere, the

two older children were committed to the Henry Watson Aid Society, and

only the baby left with Mrs. Gamma.

Our advice to Mrs. Gamma was to return to her mother, who offered her a

home. But the advice was not taken. Established in another part of

Baltimore, Gamma renewed his attack on the clergy, and told one minister

that he was a hardened criminal who had served a term in the

Penitentiary, but, after hearing one of his sermons, he desired earnestly

to reform. The latest news about the Gammas is a bit of information in

which the charitable public will have to take an interest, however

reluctantly, before very long,--there is a new baby.--"Charities Record,"

Baltimore, Vol. II, No. 8.

_A Success._--The second family consisted of a respectable, middle-aged

woman who had been twice married, four children of the first marriage,

and the second husband. The eldest daughter had married, and with her

husband occupied part of the house in which her mother lived. The other

three children were young. The second husband was a drunken fellow, who

did little for his wife's support and abused her badly. She had been to

the hospital to have a serious operation performed; and, although the

operation had been successful, her health was still poor. When first

known by the Conference the family were {208} in great destitution. The

husband brought home very little, the wife could not work, and one of the

children earned a mere trifle. The rent was unpaid, and almost the only

food the family had was oatmeal. The married daughter and her husband

said the family had been long enough quartered on them, and refused to

help them any more. The only work the woman thought she could do was

sewing, and some of this was found for her. Diet Kitchen order was

obtained for one of the children who was ill, and shoes were given to the

others. Later, the Provident Association gave groceries. At this time

the first visitor left the city, and a new one took charge of the family.

She writes: "On first calling on Mrs. X., I found a tidy,

respectable-looking woman, apparently in delicate health. Her face was

almost that of a lady, and her manners were polite; but she did not make

me very welcome. She spoke with affection of her former visitor, who,

she said, had been very kind; but she presently remarked that she could

not see why 'all these other people' had come prying into her affairs."

On inquiry it was learned that after the former visitor had left town

representatives of several charitable societies had called, and that one

had hurt the woman's feelings by asking all kinds of questions without

giving any explanation of his so doing. The visitor explained that she

knew the former visitor, and had been asked to call in her place; and,

after {209} some sympathetic explanation, the woman seemed a little

cheered. However, she resented the grocery orders she was receiving,

saying that she did not wish charity--that she was willing to earn her

living by sewing. "Why could she not have that instead of grocery

orders?" As to sewing for the shops, she said she could not do that; for

shop-work was too low paid, and she could not work on the machine. Plain

hand-sewing was the only thing she could do. When told that certain

sewing to which she referred was charity sewing, and was only given out

in winter, she exclaimed, "Then it is not work at all, but charity, just

like the grocery orders." When the visitor said good-by, she was invited

to call again. She did so repeatedly, seeing the family once a week or

oftener. On account of the drunken husband, some question was raised as

to whether the groceries should be given regularly, but Mrs. X. stated

that her husband never shared the food. He was away from home most of

the time. Sometimes he would come home Saturday night and bring some

money, and then he would take his meals at home; but, when the money was

gone, he would go out for his meals, never asking how his wife and

children fared in his absence. It did not appear that his disregard was

due to his thinking that others would care for the family. The wife

insisted that he did not think or care how they fared. He had sometimes

left her for weeks, when {210} she was ill in bed, and had never asked or

known how she had been kept alive. He appeared to be so utterly

irresponsible that he could not be made more so.

At the visitor's suggestion, it was soon decided that the younger

daughter should take a place at service, where she could earn something

and yet go home every night. Such a place the visitor found for her, and

the girl was eager to save money to buy herself a coat for the following

winter. The needs of the family, however, made it necessary to take the

earnings for living expenses; but the visitor promised that somehow a

coat for the winter should be forthcoming. When the employer closed her

house in July, the visitor found a situation for the girl for the summer

in one of the country towns. Of this time the visitor writes: "All the

time I felt that the family were suffering more than was right. The

children were fatherless and with a sick mother, and little A. was

constantly ill, first one thing and then another, the doctors saying that

he was under-nourished. Mrs. X. did jobs of washing and scrubbing as she

could get them or was able, and the two children of thirteen both worked.

So a benevolent person consented to take entire charge of the family,

giving just what I should think proper. Accordingly, from that date to

October 10 an average of $2.65 a week was given, besides $13.00 for

clothes and other things. Also, {211} Mrs. X. and the two boys were sent

to the country for one week. Notwithstanding this, Mrs. X. felt the

summer a hard one. She was not a brisk or cheerful woman. She had

suffered a great deal from the heat, and A. had diphtheria and other

illnesses." In the fall it was arranged that the girl should again go to

school; and the married sister finally offered, in order to make this

possible, to board her and provide her with boots until Christmas. The

Provident Association, after considering the case carefully, offered to

give $2.00 a week and coal and clothing. The friend who had been giving

all the help stood ready to give if more than this was needed. Two

months later Mrs. X. had her husband arrested, and sent to the Island for

a month.

In the winter Mrs. X. consulted her visitor as to the possibility of her

giving up the Provident help and supporting herself by taking boarders.

"She had friends all ready to come, and could arrange to hire additional

rooms. All she needed was extra bedding. She felt confident of success.

Her health was better than it had been for a long time, and she was

improved in energy and courage. By dint of great persuasion, the

Provident consented to give the bedding. They also promised to continue

giving coal; but the other help, it was arranged, should stop. They had

little hope, however, that the experiment would succeed. But the

experiment did succeed, and better {212} than I had anticipated. Mrs. X.

proved a good manager. She made a comfortable home, clothed the

children, and provided many little comforts of which they had long been

deprived. She became cheerful and hopeful for the future. She seemed

like a different person from the sick, discouraged woman I had known nine

months before.

"When her husband came home from the Island, I feared he might disturb

this prosperity, for he acted worse than ever; but in January he attacked

her with a knife, so she had him again arrested, and sent to the Island

for four months. She then told me she wished to take steps for a

separation. I encouraged her in this decision, but was careful not to

urge her, for I felt that such a step to be successful must be taken by

her own desire.

"So, as spring approached, I hoped that better days had really come for

this family. Unfortunately, however, in March a sad accident brought

this prosperous state of things to a sudden end. On the morning of March

10, N. brought me word that his mother had fallen downstairs and broken

her arm, and asked me to call as soon as possible. I found the poor

woman in bed, with her right wrist broken, and her face and body badly

bruised. She was in great pain, and so discouraged that it was pitiful.

Her boarders had gone, and she found herself once more dependent on

charity; but I felt I could say {213} from a full heart that the help she

now needed would not be grudged to her. For, surely, no one could help

respecting her endeavor for self-support or could regard her effort as a

failure; and, when her accident reduced her once more to dependence, her

rent was paid for the rest of the month, she had a bag of flour and other

groceries in the house, and $8.00 in money with which to pay the doctor

for setting her wrist." The visitor adds: "I think that during this

year's visiting Mrs. X. had really learned to regard me as a friend. At

first I do not think she liked me very well, and I also found it hard

cordially to like her. We were not naturally sympathetic. I am afraid

that she often thought me hard; and she had a dreary, complaining way

that tried me a great deal. But her good qualities commanded my respect

and her misfortunes my pity; and on her my evident desire to befriend her

gradually had its effect. Her first expression of real feeling was when

she consulted me about her plan for taking boarders, and that was after

nine months of constant visiting. She then said that I was the only

friend that she had in the world; and later, when the plan was in

successful operation, she told me that she attributed all her prosperity

to me, and that she was a star in my crown. That she owed all her

prosperity to me was of course an exaggeration. I could not have helped

her had she not been the essentially decent woman she was. But, at the

same {214} time, it was true that, had she not been helped and encouraged

when her destitution was so great, she would probably have lacked both

the physical and moral strength, as well as the opportunity later, to

stand upon her own feet. And, when her bad fortune again overtook her,

it was much for her that she had a friendly visitor to turn to. She felt

it so herself; and, as she lay moaning with pain, she sobbed out that I

was the only comfort she had on earth."

After the breaking of her wrist, Mrs. X. was dependent for a long time,

since the wrist did not knit properly, and her right hand was almost

disabled. It did not seem as if she could ever get on her feet again.

But after a time she wished to move to one of the country towns where she

had acquaintances. The visitor went to the place herself to examine the

chances, and decided that the plan was worth trying. The Provident

Association gave $10.00 for moving and $10.00 more for a start. After

that the visitor gave a little from time to time; but, for the most part,

the family were self-supporting. The boy worked in a factory, the girl

was employed by a neighbor, and the mother raised hens and vegetables.

At last accounts the daughter was married. Her husband is of good

character and prosperous. Both the brothers are earning good wages, the

younger one having grown from a sickly child to a strong and hearty boy.

The mother is successful with her poultry, and gets high prices for {215}

the eggs. The husband comes and goes as formerly, contributing nothing

to the family income, but doing no special harm to any but himself.

Certainly, the present condition of the family is a very happy contrast

to that in which they were first found; and certainly, also, these

changed conditions are in no small degree due to the earnest and devoted

efforts of the visitor.--Sixteenth Report of Boston Associated Charities,

pp. 45 _sq_.

_Unconscious Influence of Good Neighbors._--I would venture to say that

there is not an immoral man or woman in neighborhoods known as

disreputable, however completely he or she may have cast off

self-restraint and regard for character, who has not daily examples of

persons, close to such homes and haunts of vice, living honest and

morally clean lives, and who is not, to a degree not consciously known,

restrained and influenced by the contact. . . . Space will not permit

many instances to be stated, but, as illustrating what I am wishful to

make clear, I give two. In a court behind a street well known as bearing

almost the worst character in Manchester lives a man, paralyzed, unable

to leave an old sofa which has been his bed for months. He was in the

Royal Infirmary, and there pronounced incurable, but likely to live years

with ordinary care. He could have been taken to the workhouse hospital

at Crumpsall, where he would have {216} had careful nursing and suitable

food. He has no dread of the workhouse hospital, and would gladly go if

he had any hope of cure. He speaks most gratefully of his treatment at

the Royal Infirmary. But there is no hope of cure, and his wife and he

have determined to keep together while he lives, and he refuses the

comforts of the hospital, and she refuses to let him go from her. She

has made her home in this court, working in the room in which he lies,

with only another room for their four children. She earns an average of

5s. weekly; her eldest boy earns at a situation 5s. more, and on what is

left out of 10s., after paying 2s. 6d. rent, and buying coal and light,

the six live. (The condition of things is now improved by the guardians

deciding to take two of the children into Swinton Schools.) This is a

simple and very ordinary story. But what is the effect of the woman's

work? She says little to her neighbors. Her high purpose and her

complete devotion to her husband and children have made other women

ashamed of sin, and made men wish themselves worthy of women like her.

She has no thought that she is doing anything but giving her life for her

husband and children, has no knowledge of what the words "unconscious

influence" mean--but none the less she is "a light shining in a dark

place."

Another illustration. An old man, for forty years a laborer, never

earning more than a weekly wage of {217} 20s., who had brought up three

sons (now decent working men, married, with families), became unable to

work longer, and is allowed 5s. weekly by his last employer; the rent is

paid by his sons, who also give an occasional shilling when they visit

him. This is the whole income for himself and his wife. Some time ago

when in the street he met a young woman whom he recognized as the

daughter of a man who used to work with him. He saw that she was out for

immoral purposes and spoke to her, telling her how sorry he was to find

her leading such a life. As she appeared sorry and repentant, he took

her home to his wife to take care of her until he could see her father.

He found that the father had moved to Bury, having left his work in

Manchester from shame at his daughter's disgrace. On the Sunday, when he

could expect to find the father at home, the old man walked the seven

miles to Bury and found his former mate, but could not prevail on him to

take his daughter home. In fact, the father was very angry at being

asked, and refused to listen. The old man walked back and told his wife

that the girl must stay with them until the next Sunday, when he would

try again. The next Sunday the old man walked to Bury and saw the

father, who was somewhat softened, but still refused to see his daughter.

A walk home again, and the old man and his wife settled that the girl

should remain with them for another try to be made, and on the next

Sunday he set out on the {218} road, hopeful to succeed. The father this

time gave way, and on the following Monday the daughter went home, and

has since lived at home working regularly. The old man and his wife

don't know that they have done anything "out of common," or anything more

than ought to be done, "for a poor lass."--"Drink and Poverty," by

Councillor Alexander M'Dougall, pp. 7 _sq_.

{219}

INDEX

Accident, damages for, 23, 104.

Addams, Miss Jane, 72.

Adequate relief, 157-159.

Adulteration of food supplies, 113.

Advertising, philanthropic, 148.

American Society for the Extension of University Teaching, 137.

Associated charities. See _Charity organization societies_.

Babies, care of, 77-78.

Bad temper as a cause of unemployment, 37.

Barnato, Barney, 10.

Barnett, Mrs. Samuel, 134-135.

Baths, cheap, 96.

Beale, Miss J. F., 130.

Beggars, 25-27; child, 88-89; and free soup, 149.

Beneficial and fraternal societies, 122-123; as a source of relief, 150.

Birtwell, Miss M. L., 182.

Boarding-out dependent children, 90.

Books, lending, 133.

Booth, Charles, 197.

Bosanquet, Mrs. Bernard, 18, 29, 48, 49.

Boston Symphony Orchestra, 135.

Breadwinner, the, as head of family, 17-19, 44-57; as citizen, 19-23;

as employee, 28-41; intemperate habits of, 57-63; woman as, 72-74;

child as, 81-83.

Brown, Miss Mary Willcox, 120.

Building and loan associations, 123.

Burial insurance, 110, 119-121.

Canterbury, Archbishop of, 172.

Catholic _versus_ Protestant attitude toward the poor, 174.

Causes of poverty, 7-9; intemperance as a cause, 58; sickness, 95-96.

Character, 9.

Charitable agencies, multiplication of, 176-177.

Charity organization societies, 13, 31, 38, 55, 60, 62, 187, 189, 202.

Chattel mortgages, 115-118.

Child insurance, 122.

Child labor, 81-83, 111.

Children, of immoral parents, 49-51; of widows, 73-74, 158-159,

201-202; diet of small, 77; as breadwinners, 81-83; wayward

and dull, 83-85; reading of, 86-87; training in citizenship,

87; begging, 88-89; protection from cruelty and immorality,

89-90; boarding-out, placing-out, and institutional care of,

90-91; cleanliness for, 99; sick, 101; insuring, 122; as an

investment, 122; and stamp savings, 123; games for, 130-131;

and relief, 146.

Children's Aid societies, 85-86.

Children's charities, 76-77.

Church, the, and municipal reform, 21; and relief, 160, 167-174;

and poverty, 166-167; multiplying relations with, 168, 169;

charities of, 170-178; competition in, 171-172; as a natural

source of relief, 173-174; the chief source of the charitable

impulse, 175-176; and secular agencies, 176-177.

Church workers, who ignore the breadwinner, 18; ignore neighborhood

ties, 25, 27; ignore the fundamental conditions of family

life, 44-45; ignore the claims of children to educational

advantages, 81; allow children to be sent with begging messages, 88;

prefer to administer spiritual consolation mixed with material

relief, 144.

Citizenship, 19-23, 87.

City life _versus_ country, 40, 82.

Cleanliness, household, 69-70; personal, 99.

Clergymen, difficulties of, in guiding church charities, 170-171;

training of, for charitable work, 178.

Collection of small savings, 124.

Commodities, relief in, _versus_ relief in cash, 161.

Common sense, charitable skill based upon, 187.

Compulsory education, 80.

Conditions, reasonable, in granting relief, 190.

Confinement cases, 48, 103.

Consumptives, change of climate for, 105-106.

Contagious diseases, 101.

Contentment not always a virtue, 127-128.

Convalescents, 104.

Coöperation, between churches and secular charities, 176-177;

of the visitor with school-teachers, 79-80; with Sunday-school

teachers, 87; with children's aid society, 85; with

society for protection of children, 89-90; with board of

health, 96-101; with dispensaries, 100-101; with hospitals,

101-103; with district nurses, and diet kitchens, 103; with

educational agencies, 137; with relief agencies, 164, 201-202;

with churches, 177-178; with charity organization society,

187-189; with others charitably interested in family, 192.

Correspondence with families, 184-185, 199.

Country life for families, 41, 82.

Credit, buying on, 113; better than relief, 149.

Damage and accident cases, 23, 104.

Dampness, 97, 102, 110.

Day nurseries, 77.

De Graffenreid, Clare, 25.

Deserted wives, 48, 73-74.

Deserters, chronic, 48, 205.

Dickens, 2.

Diet, 67; of small children, 77.

Diet kitchens, 103.

Dietaries, scientific, 66-67.

Discontent, social value of, 127-128.

Dispensaries, 100-101.

District nurses, 103.

District visiting, 193-194.

Doctoring, relief work compared to, 154-155.

Dress and manners, taste in, 68.

Duplication of relief, 165.

Edgeworth, Miss, 2.

Education, 80-84, 92, 137-138.

Educational classes, 137.

Eliot, George, 2, 10, 34.

Eliot, Rev. Samuel A., 105.

Employees, 28-41.

Employer, as source of relief, 150; caution in making inquiries of, 189.

Employment, 28-41; fluctuating, 35; equalization of, 35-36, cautions

in finding, 40-41, 201-202; facts needed in finding, 186-188.

Exceptional cases, 7.

Exercise, outdoor, 98-99, 132.

Experience, need of, in relief work, 163-164.

Facts, necessary in relief, 156-157; in treatment, 186-188.

Family, the, head of, 17-19, 44-57; essential elements of, 45-46;

breaking up, 54-57; over-visiting, 184; brief biography

of heads of, 188.

Family budgets, 125.

Financial history of family, facts in, 188.

Fluctuating work, 35.

Food, buying and preparing, 65-67; adulteration of, 113.

Forms of relief, 160-162.

Fraternal societies, 122-123; as a source of relief, 150.

Fresh air charities, 78-79.

Fresh air, prejudice against, 97-98.

Friendly visiting, and social service, 5; need of, 13; introduction

to, 13; qualifications for, 14; and economic problems,

29; and employment, 36-41; men and women in, 41-43;

and household economy, 65-69; and school-teachers, 79;

and home libraries, 87; and the children, 91-93; and

sanitation, 97-101; and sickness, 101-106; and thrift, 111; and

savings, 124; and chattel mortgages, 116; and recreations,

129; and relief, 142-145, 183; and relief agencies, 164-165;

and churches, 177-178; what it is not, 180; results of, 181;

principles of, 182-195; patience in, 182-183; number of families

in, 182; by correspondence, 184-185; mutual relations in, 185;

and charity organization societies, 187-189; and others charitably

interested, 192; best done alone, 193; distinguished from

district visiting, 193-194; illustrations of continuous, 197-215.

Fuel, 68-69; saving for, 134.

Funerals, 119-121.

Games, 130-131.

Godkin, E. L., 21.

Gymnasiums, 132.

Health, 95-106; saving at expense of, 110.

Hill, Miss Octavia, 35, 128, 181.

Home, the, the unit of society, 44; relief should be given in, 145-146.

Home libraries, 86-87, 197-198.

Hospital care, 101; prejudice against, 101-103.

Howells, W. D., 70.

Humor, sense of, necessary in charity, 129.

Ignorance of English as a cause of unemployment, 39.

Imposture, 168-170.

Improvident poor, 112.

Inadequate relief, 157-159, 173.

Incapacity as a cause of unemployment, 34.

Incurables, 104-105.

Indiscriminate giving, 4, 6; by the poor, 25-27; weakens

neighborhood ties, 27; weakens family ties, 45-47; to

children, 88-89; materialism of, 141; results of, 157, 204-205.

Individual service, and social service, 5-6; dangers of, 7.

Industrial insurance, 120-121.

Influence, power of personal, 92-93; patience in gaining, 182-183;

of good neighbors, 197, 215-218.

Instalment purchases, 24, 113-115.

Institutional care, 162; of children, 90-91; for chronic cases, 191.

Insurance, industrial, 120-121.

Intemperance, 7, 48-49, 54, 57-63; recreations as a cure of, 132-133.

Interference with individual rights, 12.

Interim relief, 154.

Invalids, chronic, 103-104; migration of, 105-106.

Investigation, 155-157, 186-189; caution concerning inquiries of

landlords and employers, 189.

Jewett, Sarah Orne, 3.

Juvenile offenders, 85, 88-89.

Kelley, Mrs. Florence, 82.

Kindergartens, 79; first supported by churches, 175-176.

Krohn, Professor William O., 83.

Landlords who sub-let, 24; as creditors, 162; caution concerning

inquiries of, 189.

Laws for protection of children, 91.

Lectures, free, 137.

Legal extortions, 23.

Libraries, free, 133.

Loan companies, 115-118; philanthropic, 117; building and, 123.

Loan exhibitions, 133-135.

Loans, 161.

Loch, C. S., 125.

Lowell, Mrs. Josephine Shaw, 54, 73, 118, 157-159.

Man of the family, often overlooked, 17; should apply for relief, 145.

Manual training, 92.

Married vagabonds, 47-57, 93, 146, 158, 164, 202-215.

Mason, Miss, 90.

Materialism of the charitable, 141, 171.

Medical service, cheap grade of, 100.

Men as friendly visitors, 41.

Migration of invalids, 105.

Money, relief in, 161.

Mothers' meetings, 74-75.

Municipal reform, 6, 21.

Music, 135-137.

Negro prejudice against hospitals, 102-103.

Neighborhood standard, and relief-giving, 163-164; and plans

for permanent improvement, 191.

Neighbors, 24-25, 27; as a source of relief, 150; effects of relief

upon, 163, 190; influence of good, 215-218.

Newspaper appeals for individual cases of need, 147, 206.

Non-support laws, 53.

Novels, poverty in, 2; sociological, 3.

Odd jobs, 36.

Open spaces, 96.

Outdoor relief, public, 151-152.

Outings, 78-79, 131.

Over-visited families, 184.

Parasites, 11.

Partnership, with the poor in relief, 159; in plans for their

welfare, 190.

Patent medicines, 100, 110.

Patronage, 10, 75.

Pauper burial, 118-119.

Pauperism not poverty, 11.

Pawning, 118.

Peabody, Professor F. G., 127.

Peabody, George, 133.

Pensions, for widows with children, 74; continued after need

has ceased, 155; to supplement natural resources, 162.

Physical defects as a cause of unemployment, 38; as a cause

of juvenile delinquency, 83-85.

Physical history of family, facts in, 187.

Pickton, Miss, 173.

Pictures, lending, 133-135.

Placing-out dependent children, 90.

Plans for relief, 154-157; changed with changing conditions, 155;

based on facts, 155-156; for permanent improvement, 189-192.

Pleasures the measure of a man, 129.

Pledges, temperance, 61.

Policemen as distributors of relief, 19.

Political corruption, 21-23; and public relief, 151.

Poor, the, not a social class, 10-12; charity of, 25-27; treated

as dependent animals, 125; partnership with, in plans of

relief, 159-160.

Poverty, phases in our treatment of, 5; cure of, 29; problems of

not so simple as they seem, 140.

Principles of relief-giving, 145-162.

Probation system for juvenile offenders, 85-86.

Protection of children from cruelty and immorality, 89-90;

societies for, 89; laws for, 91.

Provident poor, 111.

Public distributions of relief, 147.

Publicity in charity, demoralization of, 146-148.

Putnam, Mrs. James, 76.

Quack doctors, 100.

Reading, 133; of children, 86-87.

Recreation, 127-139.

References, lack of, as a cause of unemployment, 37.

Relatives as a source of relief, 149-150.

Relief, policemen as distributors of, 19; of married vagabond's

family, 50-54; of drunkard's family, 61; of children, 76-77;

and hospital care, 102; of thriftless families, 112; and

recreation, 138-139; a valuable tool, 140-141; friendly visitors as

dispensers of, 142-145; six principles of, 145-162; with a future,

153-154; societies for, 153; interim, 154; compared with

doctoring, 154-155; with a plan, 155-157; adequate, 157-159; in

work, 160; in kind, 161; duplication of, 165; church, 167-174;

as a gospel agency, 171-173; with conditions, 190.

Relief in work, 160.

Relief societies, 153.

Rent, 156, 162.

Richardson, 2.

Saloon, the, 57, 128, 133.

Sanitation, improved, 96.

Saving, 35, 111, 119-125; unthrifty forms of, 110-111; savings

banks, 118-119, 123; beginnings of, 119; for burial, 119-121;

for sickness, 122; stamp, 123-124; collections, 124; for fuel, 124.

School-teachers, 79-80

Scott, 2.

Seasonal occupations, 36.

Self-help, resources for, 190.

Self-sustaining families, 193.

Sentimental charity, 4.

Settlements, 5, 8, 108.

Shaftesbury, Lord, 10.

Sham homes, 46.

Sick benefits, 122.

Sickness, as a cause of poverty, 95-96; outside hospitals, 103-104;

facts needed in helping, 186-188.

Smith, Miss Frances, 181.

Smith, Miss Zilpha D., 36, 58, 79, 142.

Social classes, 10-12.

Social history of family, facts needed in, 187.

Social service, 5.

Soup kitchens, 148-149.

Sources of relief, natural, 149-150; relief societies, 150; public

outdoor relief, 151; multiplication of, 152-153.

Spasmodic charity, 191,

Spencer, Mrs. Anna Garlin, 81.

Spending, 111, 112, 125,

Stamp savings, 123-124.

Strikes, 31-32.

Study, supplementary to experience, 15; of charity in theological

seminaries, 178.

Suggestion, power of, 18, 71-72.

Suggestions about visiting not all applicable to one family, 179.

Summer visiting, 185.

Sunday-schools, multiplication of, 87-88, 168, 177.

Sympathy and sentimentality, 71.

Tact, 14.

Tammany Hall's charity, 20.

Tenements, unsanitary, 96.

Thanet, Octave, 3.

Theological seminaries, course of charitable instruction in, 178.

Thomas, Theodore, 135-137.

Thrift, 108-112; and wages, 109; includes spending, 110-111;

divides the poor into three classes, 111-112.

Thriftless, the, 109-110, 156.

Trade-unions, 30, 32.

Training of charity workers, life the best school for the, 14, 145,

181-182; common sense in, 187; economic questions in, 29.

Undertakers and industrial insurance, 121.

Unemployed, in place of strikers, 31-32; number of, 33; treatment

of, 34.

Unemployment, causes of, 33-40.

University extension, 137.

Unsanitary surroundings, 96-97; tenements, 96.

Unthrifty forms of saving, 110-111.

Unworthy not a descriptive term as applied to the poor, 154.

Usury, 115-118.

Vagabonds, married, 47-57, 93, 146, 158, 164, 202-215.

Ventilation, 97-98.

Visiting, continuous, 182-185; illustrations of continuous, 197-215;

patience in, 182-183, 200; illustrations of successful, 197-202,

207-215; in summer, 185. See also _Friendly visiting_.

Wants, social value of varied, 127.

Warner, A. G., 33, 95.

Wayward children, 83-86; girls, 216-218.

Widows with children, 73-74, 158-159, 201-202.

Window-gardening, 131-132.

Winter not the only season for charitable work, 184.

Wolcott, Mrs. Roger, 70.

Women as homemakers, 64-75; as breadwinners, 72-74.

Work history of family, facts needed in, 187-188.

Worthy and unworthy, 154.

Friendly Visiting among the Poor: A Handbook for Charity Workers · 第 11 / 11 章