II.

Completely surrounding the business district of Pittsburgh, in a belt

of varying width that disregards the intercepting river, is a section

of mean streets, of crowded housing conditions, and if not of genuine

poverty, at least of the discomforts which poverty elsewhere brings.

This juxtaposition is a familiar phenomenon in urban development, for

it is based on the social necessity that the least paid wage earners

live within walking distance of their work; on the willingness, and

even desire, of the well-to-do to live at a distance from the noise and

smoke of business sections; and on the attraction which the constant

stimulus of "city" life exerts on those who have few other sources of

entertainment. That the river sides do not relieve and break up this

belt, is due in part to the local topography. Across the Allegheny, the

land is low and subject to flood; across the Monongahela, there is

only a narrow strip between the river and the highlands that, rising

steeply, offer sites with purer air and wider outlook but that must be

reached by riding. Neither river is itself attractive as an outlook for

residences.

The civic improvement needs of this poorer and crowded district may be

grouped under five general heads. These are: (a) municipal,--as the

matter of street improvement; (b) housing,--with which this discussion

does not attempt to deal; (c) playspace and opportunity for children;

(d) park provision,--which may best be considered in connection

with the similar needs of the whole community; and (e) bathing

facilities,--which here can be no more than mentioned.

(a) Municipal. The primary municipal need, in so far at least as the

region adjacent to the Allegheny is concerned, is flood prevention.

That is a city matter plus a good deal else, which will be considered

elsewhere in this issue.

The street needs are many and pressing. Conditions in this matter are

absolutely disgraceful. Narrow streets are the rule in old Pittsburgh,

and smooth pavements cannot be expected upon steep streets. But with

all possible allowance for these facts, there is much that might

be undone. The streets are not all steep. Steep streets can be kept

clean,--more easily, indeed, than others. Cobblestone pavements can be

banished.

[Illustration: AN ITALIAN COURT IN THE HILL DISTRICT.]

Well laid brick pavements, or asphalt, or smooth wood blocks where

practicable,--and all frequently flushed, are a necessity for this

region. Cleanliness, too, should be the rule in the streets and alleys

of the poorer sections; and it is here especially that the standard of

municipal administration in Pittsburgh needs raising. Only within the

past year has the public removal of rubbish been adopted as a municipal

function.

It may be profitably reflected that in no other area of the Pittsburgh

District would an equal amount of improvement affect so many

residents. With original paving costs a general tax, with sanitation in

this section a matter of prime importance outside the locality itself,

and with the borrowing capacity of the city very large, there ought

to be a pretty general reconstruction of the street surface of this

district on modern lines. Such improvement ought not to be difficult

and, incidentally, should appeal to the pride of Pittsburgh. The

stranger, arriving at any of the railroad stations, finds little to

admire in the business district. And when he leaves that, in whatsoever

direction he goes,--whether to the fashionable East End, to the

Carnegie Institute, to any of the parks, to the pleasant old-fashioned

homes in Allegheny, or to the heights beyond the Monongahela, he must

pass through this dreary belt of municipal neglect. It is here that

unfavorable first impressions become fixed. These regions give a bad

character to the whole city.

The necessity for playgrounds is pressing, so pressing that an earnest,

self-sacrificing effort has been made to meet it. The work of the

modern playground gives benefit in three directions: physical, social

and educational. This is recognized by the Pittsburgh Playground

Association, an incorporated body which receives appropriations from

the municipality, supplements these with private donations, and

with the volunteer work of individuals and clubs. In recognition of

the threefold aspect of what is sweepingly called the "playground"

movement, the association conducts "recreation parks" and vacation

schools, as well as mere playgrounds. It holds the theory that "there

should be three kinds of recreation centers: first, the school-yard

for small children who cannot go more than a few squares from home;

then the larger playground with apparatus and facilities for healthy

play for all the boys and girls of a neighborhood; third, the athletic

field, where teams may meet and where the interest of the community

may center." It is clear from this that the lack of play facilities

arises from insufficient material provision rather than from inadequate

ideals. These provisions are gradually increasing but they have far

to go before they will be complete. Thirty square feet of playground

space for each child is the minimum provision recommended in Washington

and London, and in a bill lately introduced in the Massachusetts

Legislature. If the allowance seems too liberal, translate the

"thirty square feet" into six feet by five,--the size of a desk! Rich

Pittsburgh falls woefully short of this figure. Her need is for more,

and more adequately fitted, playgrounds. The poorer districts need them

most and the first provision should be made there. This is said with

due regard to the limitation of a playground's scope. The sore need for

parks located more conveniently to the immense working population, than

the present parks of Pittsburgh are, and developed more appropriately

to their needs, has not been confused with the community's need

for children's play-spaces and recreation grounds. The latter is a

separate, urgent and co-existent want, concerned, as is park provision,

with the very structure of the city, involving similarly its social

welfare, and making a strong appeal in the name of the children. Such

a survey of available sites (without buildings or with buildings of

little value) as that undertaken by the playground association the

past summer should be made the basis for the reservation of sites in

congested neighborhoods and outlying districts.

Charities and the Commons: The Pittsburgh Survey, Part II. The Place and Its Social Forces · 第 56 / 139 题