_M. Lecamus Expresses His Views._
|AFTER a while Marceline was able to persuade Théophraste to confide in
M. Adolphe Lecamus. She declared that Adolphe’s great experience, his
certain knowledge of the science of metaphysics, ought to be a great
help to a man who had buried treasures two hundred years before and
wished to find them again. “And,” she added, “it is he who will be
able to reveal your identity.”
He yielded to her persuasions, and in the morning told Adolphe
everything. Adolphe was astonished, and it surprised Théophraste that a
man who professed Spiritualism should show so much emotion when face to
face with a reincarnated spirit. He said that Théophraste’s conduct
at the dinner table the day before and the words he uttered to him
before and since the visit to the Conciergerie were well calculated to
prepare him for such a confidence, but he did not expect such a thing
as this. He demanded to see the proof of such a phenomenon. Théophraste
readily showed the document, and Adolphe could not deny the authenticity
of it. He recognized the handwriting at once, and exclaimed, upon
examination, that the handwriting explained many things to him. He
had often thought how curiously the characters in Théophraste’s
handwriting differed from his real character. It had always been
difficult for him to associate the handwriting with Théophraste.
“Really,” said Théophraste, “what character do you ascribe to
me?”
“Well, if you will promise not to bear me any ill, I will tell you!”
On this assurance he painted Théophraste’s character. It was that
of a kind citizen, an honest merchant, an excellent husband, but a man
incapable of showing any firmness, wit or energy. He told him also
that his timidity was excessive, and that kindness was always ready to
degenerate into weakness. The picture was not at all flattering, and
Théophraste felt a little hurt.
“And now,” said he, “that you have told me what you think of my
character, tell me what you think of my writing.”
Then he made observations on his handwriting which would not have failed
to make him quite angry if he had not remembered that Signor Petito had
said the same. He said:
“Your writing expresses all the contrary sentiments in your nature as
I know it, and I can imagine nothing more antithetical than your writing
and your real character. Thus you do not write a characteristic hand,
but the handwriting of the Other.”
Théophraste was deeply interested. He thought of the strength and
energy of the Other, he imagined that he was a great captain. However,
Adolphe’s next remark completely disillusioned him.
“Any sign in those formations, in the pointed fashion they have of
reuniting, and in the way of growing tall and of climbing up, and of
passing each other, show energy, firmness, obstinacy, ardor, activity,
and ambition, but all for evil.”
This dismayed him, but he exclaimed with a show of spirit: “Where is
the evil? Where is the good? If Attila had known how to write perhaps he
would have written like Napoleon.”
“They called Attila the scourge of God.”
“And Napoleon the scourge of man,” replied Théophraste, with
difficulty controlling his anger.
How could it be that Théophraste Longuet could have been anything else
but an honest being before his birth, during his life, and after his
death?
Marceline agreed with him, and Adolphe fearing that he had gone too far
made apologies.